Minimising currency exposure

Ron Liesching, chairman of Mountain Pacific Group, an investment firm that contributed to the development of the FTSE Wealth Preservation Unit, examines a new solution to managing currency risk.

Global investors struggle with one central issue, currency risk. Now there is a new solution: the FTSE Wealth Preservation Unit (WPU). The WPU is a diversified basket consisting of 13 components that are designed to preserve global value.

Primarily a basket that includes the seven most liquid developed currencies and the four BRIC currencies, the FTSE WPU also has a small weight in two commodities – oil and gold.

Components of FTSE WPU

Source: FTSE, weights as of February 17, 2012

The dollar and beyond

Sponsored Content

Investors hold most of their assets in developed countries; the investments are attractive, but the currency exposure is not. For example, global developed market equities have 50 per cent exposure to the US dollar and another 31 per cent exposure to the euro, yen and pound sterling.

This undiversified currency basket is the side effect of equity investment. The currency basket is unattractive because these countries have unsustainable deficits and are at risk of credit downgrades. US, Euro and UK interest rates are well below inflation and no investor would recommend this currency basket.

The solution is to hedge the currency exposure into a superior diversified basket. Many have proposed this. At its 2011 annual conference, UBS surveyed over 80 managers of central banks, sovereign wealth funds and multilaterals with total assets over $8 trillion. Over half the respondents predicted that the dollar would be replaced by a currency basket within the next 25 years.

The World Bank’s Robert Zoellick went further in a November 2010 Financial Times article in which he proposed a new monetary system based on the major global currencies – including the dollar, euro, yen, pound and renminbi – that also makes use of gold.

 

Preserving long-term wealth
The volatility of FTSE WPU measured against the US dollar is currently 6 per cent per annum and the FTSE WPU yield is near 2 per cent per annum.

Hedging into FTSE WPU does not disturb existing investments. A separate currency-hedging program replaces the concentrated currency risk with FTSE WPU exposure. The WPU is designed to be liquid, so hedging $1 billion would have little market impact.

When revenues are in one currency, the FTSE WPU is especially useful as Ghazi Abdul Jawad, an advisory board member for FTSE WPU and chairman of Altaira Middle East noted: “A fall in the US dollar hits both oil revenues and the value of US assets. So partly hedging assets into FTSE WPU sharply reduces the US dollar risk that investors in this region face.”

Ultra high net worth groups and monetary authorities understand there is no riskless currency. They want to preserve long-term wealth in global terms. Philip Coggan, Buttonwood columnist at the Economist, notes in his new book, “Paper Promises”, that “The massive debts accumulated over the last 40 years can’t be repaid in full, and they won’t be paid”.

This is already happening: US inflation is currently 3 per cent per annum. As the Treasury Bill rate is 5 basis points, nearly 3 per cent per annum is being lost in real wealth. Inflation is the best way for democracies to deal with excessive debt. But this is doubly bad for foreign investors. Foreign investors lose from internal devaluation caused by inflation and external devaluation caused by declining currency value. This is why investors want to hedge their paper currency risk and preserve their wealth in global terms. The components in FTSE WPU are weighted to minimise these two paper currency risks. The movement of a currency against FTSE WPU shows how the global value of that currency is evolving. That rate is published daily by FTSE.

On December 31, 2011, one WPU bought US$1.

 

 

Asset Owner:World Bank

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous