This paper concludes that the average asset allocation of elite institutions and top‐performing funds is the single most important determinant of their superior returns during the last 20 years.
To access the paper click below:
This paper concludes that the average asset allocation of elite institutions and top‐performing funds is the single most important determinant of their superior returns during the last 20 years.
To access the paper click below:
Analysis of asset class and sector fund flows in 2011 reveals investors’ propensity to flock to defensive assets, according to data from EPFR Global.
Emerging market equities revealed the biggest difference year on year, with outflows of $47.7 billion for 2011 contrasting with inflows of $95.6 billion for the previous year.
The emerging markets equity funds tracked by EPFR Global ended 2011 with their seventh consecutive weekly outflow with uncertainty around Europe, China’s prospects this year, and high levels of inflation all cited as drivers.
Developed market equities also had significant outflows of $123 billion for the year.
All bond funds saw inflows of about $110.6 billion, with US bond funds attracting $62.3 billion for the year.
European bond flows saw a record outflow for the year of $29.8 billion, with the previous year recording inflows of $3 billion.
Within sector funds, commodities also attracted significant inflows, with about $12.8 billion for the year, with currency hedging being the significant motivation.
EPFR Global tracks traditional and alternative funds with about $13 trillion in assets.
Meanwhile State Street’s Investor Confidence index reveals a changing risk appetite from 2010 to 2011. At the end of 2011 the index was 99.3 and a year earlier it was around 104.5.
The index, which was developed by Harvard University professor Kenneth Froot and Paul O’Connell of State Street Associates, measures investor confidence, or risk appetite, by analysing the buying and selling patterns of institutional investors.
The index assigns a precise meaning to changes in investor risk appetite: the greater the percentage allocation to equities the higher risk appetite or confidence. A reading of 100 is neutral and represents the level at which investors aren’t increasing or decreasing their allocations to risky assets.
Macro-economic risks remain the biggest investment concern this year, while certain distressed assets will present the best opportunities, according to managing director of Cambridge Associates, Sandra Urie.
“The dislocation in European markets has already created investment opportunities across different credit markets, and we believe these may expand as the pace of European bank deleveraging accelerates,” she says.
“We believe investors should consider staggering commitments to European distressed funds over time, though we recognise that some European distressed funds are already finding attractive opportunities, and that some funds will offer vintage year diversification through a multi-year capital call structure.”
The timing of how this occurs may be more difficult to assess, she says, as a bank’s decision to sell an asset can be influenced by a variety of factors. She says investors should also stagger investments over time.
“On one hand, some banks have taken write-downs on assets or face higher capital charges and may therefore be open to sales, while on the other, significant government equity stakes in banks and the availability of liquidity, for example through repo lines, means that the pressure to sell assets may be reduced.”
In addition, she says European banks’ continued reductions in loan commitments are creating a vacuum, which hedge funds and private equity firms are filling.
However a defensive posture is important given the continued macro risks, Urie says.
“We continue to regard high quality equities with stable, proven franchises, and steady earnings and profits as an important core investment for participating in equity upside while investing in high quality assets that should be able to weather potential storms that may arise.”
The investment concerns at the beginning of this year, as identified by Cambridge, remain the same as in 2011.
At the start of last year, the firm’s five main concerns were:
“While all of these concerns have serious implications, an overarching worry is that there is a tremendous amount of political disagreement about the appropriate way to deal with such risks,” Urie says.
“We enter 2012 in much the same place as 2011. Macro risks are our primary concern and the biggest risk we can see is the inability of the political system to deal effectively and decisively with the debt problem and that global imbalances lead to further erosion in confidence and further capital destruction.”












The downgrade of the US took the entire industry by surprise, in a year that confirmed the complexity and unpredictability of markets, CalSTRS chief investment officer, Christopher Ailman, says. (more…)
Someone once told me the reason the Dalai Lama is always smiling, even when he’s talking about war, is that his view of the world, and all its troubles, is like a knowing father watching a child work through the wonderment and challenges of life. It is with this view that institutional investors must face the climate change challenge. (more…)