MSCI looks at why investors may have a limited small cap representation in their equity portfolios and how this may potentially impact on both risk and returns.

The researchers find that investors may be making an unintentional decision to minimise their exposure to small caps that could have cost 60 basis points of annual performance over the last decade.

The flight to quality was not limited to certain developed-country debt during the volatility in the second half of 2011. Indeed, Pimco’s global co-head of emerging-markets portfolio management Ramin Toloui says that some emerging-market government bonds are potential safe havens during times of market stress.

He says that the bond giant’s Global Advantage Government Bond Index now has an approximately 35 per cent exposure to emerging-markets.

A standard government-bond index typically has an exposure of around 5 per cent to emerging-market government debt, Toloui says.

Pimco’s Global Advantage Bond Indexes (GLADI) are a series of GDP-weighted, investment-grade fixed income benchmarks. Pimco uses the indexes as benchmarks from which it takes active positions around for its GLADI group of funds. These GLADI funds have more than $9.4 billion in combined assets under management in both government and corporate bond strategies.

An increased exposure to emerging markets also fits into Pimco’s overarching view of the long-term global rebalancing underway, with slow-growing developed markets deleveraging and capital shifting to assets in fast-growing emerging markets.

“If you look at a world where many investors are looking to diversify their global bond holdings, such as sovereign wealth funds in the Middle East and Asia and central banks, a key asset class they are going into is government debt in emerging-market countries,” Toloui says.

“So we think because of this re-allocation, part of that is going to result in yield compression and rising currencies.”

 

Divergence in emerging markets

This year, capital flow research firm EPFR Global notes that movement into local currency emerging-market bond funds enjoyed nine weeks of positive flows up until the first week of April.

Toloui warns that traditional market-weighted bond indexes may, in fact, have a greater allocation to the biggest issuers of debt, namely developed-market economies, diminishing the defensive characteristics typically associated with government bonds.

The strong balance sheets of some emerging countries have meant they have more policy flexibility to deal with market uncertainty than many indebted industrialised countries, Toloui says.

“The key factors are the levels of external indebtedness and the debt-service payments relative to foreign reserves is absolutely essential,” he says.

According to Toloui, passive government-bond strategies that use traditional market-weighted bond indexes have a high allocation to the largest debt issuers, potentially diminishing the defensive characteristics typically associated with government bonds. Pimco prefers GDP-weighted indexes, which its research reveals results in an average gross government debt-to-GDP of 82 per cent across the countries in its government bond index. This compares to an average debt-to-GDP of 138 per cent for an equally weighted selection of three common market cap-weighted indexes.

He points to a necessary shift in the way bond investors should think about how industrialised and emerging-market countries perform in times of global economic stress.

“Traditionally in risky market conditions, you have industrialised-country bonds rally as central banks cut rates and emerging-market bonds face pressure because emerging markets had to raise rates to prevent capital flight and defend the currency,” Toloui says.

“Recently, however, there has been a big divergence in emerging markets with some countries, like Hungary and Turkey, falling into the old model of having to raise interest rates when there is capital flight, but other countries, like Brazil, being able to cut rates aggressively to shield their economies in periods of external stress.”

Brazilian two-year bond yields fell by more than 200 basis points in the second half of 2011, more than those in Germany and the US.

Italy, Turkey and Hungary saw bond yields rise by more than 200 basis points over the same time period.

 

Reconsider bond investments and asset allocation

Toloui makes the point in a new research article that investors who purchased Italian bonds a decade ago would have anticipated that yields compensated for interest rate risk – primarily the volatility of interest rates in the eurozone.

In contrast, purchasers of Brazilian bonds would have wanted a yield that compensated for the potential credit risk of Brazil not paying its debts. This is completely reversed in 2012, with investors perceiving credit risk in Italian bonds, while purchasers of Brazilian local currency debt would have been focused on central-bank policy and its impact on interest rates.

Pimco now makes the distinction between hard interest-rate durations, when yields on these bonds typically fall during times of market stress, and soft-credit duration, when yields rise during market stress.

“The old mental apparatus in investing in bonds seems to be reconsidered, and therefore the asset allocation needs to be re-considered,” Toloui says.

“Investment in emerging market bonds can provide income but can also provide some of the attractive qualities that bonds have in periods of volatility.”

Investors who structure a bond portfolio around the traditional dichotomy of developed markets representing hard-duration interest-rate risk and emerging-market soft-duration risk may, in fact, find they are holding assets that are acting like a credit risk, Toloui notes in his research.

He does, however, acknowledge that the financial markets of emerging markets are currently not deep or liquid enough to deal with large-scale capital in-flows that would result from global investors looking to allocate up to a third of their government-bond portfolios to emerging markets.

Pimco sees considerable first-mover advantage for investors who position themselves early to take advantage of the push into emerging-market debt, but Toloui warns that valuations may be bumpy.

“Positioning yourself there early is a way of taking advantage of the fact that we anticipate that there is going to be large capital flows going in as more investors allocate to these markets,” he says.

“In that journey, we are going to have periods where valuations are stretched where a lot of money moves in in a short period of time and we, as active managers, are trying to be mindful of that. Emerging markets are smaller. Navigating those markets is more difficult than it is in deep, liquid markets in industrial countries, but it does mean that getting there before others is especially important and also being sensitive to valuations as you are making your investments.”

The recent sharp growth in US corporate defined-benefit-plan liabilities, coupled with concerns that interest rates will start to rise from current historical lows, is slowing the push to de-risk plans, Wilshire Consulting’s head of investment research, Steven Foresti says.

The latest Wilshire Consulting research into defined-benefit (DB) plans at S&P 500 companies reveals that aggregate funding ratios for all plans combined had decreased from 84.9 per cent to 79.7 per cent.

The funding shortfall at the beginning of the year has grown by $286.9 billion to a total of $1,415.5 billion. This represents an 11.2-per-cent increase in liabilities in 2011, driven by a discount rate that has fallen 5.01 per cent.

“The tendency with this dynamic de-risking is to move more heavily into fixed income but plans are waiting for the opportunities to present themselves based on both where the yield environment is and where funding ratios are,” Foresti says.

Exacerbating the push to de-risk by allocating more to fixed income is the return assumptions of many funds. These assumptions are another vital component to calculating a fund’s long-term liabilities.

 

Warnings from Wilshire

Wilshire warns in its 2012 Wilshire Consulting Report on Corporate Pension Funding Levels that it expects the long-term forecast for return on corporate-pension assets to be approximately 5.6 per cent, well above plans’ median-return assumptions of 7.95 per cent.

The report cautions that the difference between market-based earnings and these so-called accounting earnings used to calculate liabilities cannot continue unabated. Once this gap exceeds 10 per cent of assets, it must be amortised over time, further worsening the liability picture for underfunded plans.

“Funds are looking at if an investment program can be put together that begins to mimic some of the volatility in liabilities, so assets tend to move up when liabilities move up and down when liabilities move down. Then you have a much predictable funding ratio and a much more predictable set of contributions going forward,” he says.

“The problem with doing that is you have to invest in a heavy fixed-income portfolio, which means that expected returns come down, and a big detriment to plans is that – if you look at the interest rate environment we are in now, low-rate environments where plans are concerned – one of the scenarios that could happen, whether triggered by inflation or other sources, is a rise in rates.”

Wilshire finds that corporate DB funds still have a strong exposure to equities, with a median allocation to public-market equity of 51 per cent, compared to 36.3 per cent for public-market fixed income.

Interestingly, Foresti says that the research does not reveal a strong link between funding levels and equity exposure, with the data not showing funds with low funding levels chasing returns through high allocations to equities.

A fixed-income push is more apparent when looking at the biggest 100 DB-corporate plans in the US.

 

Fixed income allocations up over equity

Actuarial and consultancy firm, Milliman, has also released its own study of funding levels among these 100 largest DB plans. It finds that for the first time fixed-income allocations are larger than equity allocations.

Overall, the 100 companies Milliman studied allocated 38 per cent of their pension-fund assets to equities. This was down from 44 per cent in 2010 and 55 per cent in 2007.

This compares to 41 per cent for fixed-income instruments, up from 36 per cent in 2010 and 33 per cent at the end of 2007.

“The decline in equity allocations reflects one form of pension-risk management: de-risking,” the report notes. “Plans pursuing liability-driven investment strategies are typically reducing their exposure to equities, increasing their allocation to fixed income and lengthening the duration of fixed-income assets to more closely match their liabilities.”

Foresti says many of its clients are looking at dynamic de-risking plans, which look to target particular allocations that lower risk as funding levels improve.

 

Maudlin at Mercer and Milliman

This view is borne out by a Mercer survey of chief financial officers (CFOs) in December last year that found that 40 per cent of them were either already or very likely to increase allocations to fixed income in the next two years. Almost a third reported that they were already or were going to start a dynamic de-risking strategy.

Chief financial officers were also pessimistic about the prospects for their DB plans, with almost 60 per cent saying these pension plans posed at least moderate risk to their respective company’s near-term performance.

In attempting to address this funding situation, Milliman says it is expecting 2012 to be a record year for company contributions to pension plans.

It notes that contribution for the Milliman 100 companies in 2011 fell from $60.3 billion to $55.1 billion.

Milliman predicts that 2012 contributions should rise to a new record level of more than $80 billion.

According to Foresti, another advantage of putting a de-risking strategy in place is that it limits some of the behavioural risks that plans may have suffered from in the past, when they were lulled into a false sense of security in bull markets.

“It is very natural if you have only experienced positive market returns and a tranquil environment to feel much more confident about the future and potentially discount the risks that are embedded in investments a bit more than you may have if you have gone through a difficult environment,” he says.

It could also be potentially more difficult at that time to say, hey, let’s move to a lower risk portfolio in that environment.”

General Electric had the largest funding shortfall of the 316 S&P 500 plans in the Wilshire survey at $18.4 billion.

Three other companies showed a pension-funding shortfall exceeding $10 billion for the fiscal year 2011: Boeing Company at $16.6 billion, Lockheed Martin with $13.3 billion and AT&T at $10.6 billion.

Boeing and Lockheed Martin have both announced that they expect pension contributions in 2012 to be at least $1 billion.

Milliman notes that while the funding deficits grew in 2011, the deficits represented less than 10 per cent of market capitalisation for 65 of the 100 companies that researchers looked at.

 

 

Moving from reactive engagement to proactively working with companies and regulators to avoid major environmental, social or corporate governance (ESG) events has become a key focus of the Swedish Ethical Council, its new head says.

Newly appointed chairwoman Ulrika Danielson says that the council, which is a collaborative engagement effort for the AP 1 to 4 buffer funds, has moved into the next stage of its development after it was launched in 2007.

Assisting this preventative push, the Ethical Council is also working more closely with other investors, including asset managers, to push companies to improve their sustainability performance.

“From the beginning, the Ethical Council focused mainly on reactive work and engaged with companies where convention breaches had been proven,” Danielson says.

“Today we have a much greater focus on preventive initiatives and dialogues. Moreover, we collaborate with other investors on a regular basis. Collaboration with investors and demand for transparency, both for companies and investors, will continue to increase in the future.”

The council prioritises face-to-face meetings with executives and boards of companies. Its proactive engagement is done on a confidential basis and aims to persuade the particular company to improve its internal processes around environmental and ethical issues, as well as the transparency of its reporting.

 

Best-practice guidelines

Such proactive engagement has been seen in encouraging a North American mining company to improve its dialogue with the local communities affected by its operations, entering into dialogue with a European timber company on issues of sustainable forestry initiatives and working with two European oil companies on deep-sea-drilling safety concerns.

In its recently released annual report, the Ethical Council details a range of engagements with companies, including an innovative mining project that aims to apply the industry’s own best-practice guidelines to the companies the funds invest in.

The project resulted from a 2008 report into the mining industry, which Danielson says came out of a number of engagements the council had conducted with mining companies.

“On the basis of this report and our experience that mining companies also face challenges regarding corruption, social issues such as respecting indigenous rights and communicating with local communities, as well as often having operations in countries with weak laws, we started this initiative,” she says.

The mining project enlisted the cooperation of Dutch fund PGGM and the seventh AP fund.

As part of the project, 30 mining companies operating in different parts of world were evaluated for the compliance with the 10 principles of sustainable development issued by the International Council of Mining and Metals.

The research found the lowest level of compliance with principles that dealt with engaging constructively and respecting the rights of indigenous and local communities. The companies ranked highest on implementing risk management based on valid data and sound science.

 

Making a difference

Other issues the council has focused on include tackling corruption, the working conditions of employees in the electronics industry, climate change and carbon disclosure, and the sustainability of the oil industry.

Over the course of 2011, the Ethical Council conducted engagements with 126 companies – 52 from North America, 40 European and 26 Asian.

The 800-pound gorilla of the real estate market, sovereign wealth funds, is increasingly exercising its muscle by investing directly in property as a way of cutting fees and potentially achieving better returns, new research finds.

The latest snapshot of sovereign wealth funds’ interest in property by alternative-asset researcher Preqin shows that 85 per cent of sovereign wealth funds now invest directly in real estate.

Sarah Unsworth, a Preqin analyst, finds the highest number of direct-real-estate investors are also the biggest sovereign wealth funds, with more than $250 billion in assets.

 

High rollers from the East

Funds from emerging market economies in the Middle East and Asia dominate the list of sovereign wealth funds that are the biggest investors in real estate (see table).

Unsworth’s research shows that the total combined assets of such funds now stands at more than $44.62 trillion and increased by nearly 15 per cent since 2011.

Alex Jones, a Preqin senior analyst, says that the push for direct investment in recent years comes amid a backdrop of increased allocations to alternatives by sovereign wealth funds.

Average target allocations to property were 7.8 per cent in 2011, down from 8.4 per cent in 2010, while average actual allocations were 7.5 per cent in 2011, up from 7 per cent in 2010.

Average target allocations have come back slightly as older institutions accomplished the push to expand alternatives allocations, as newer sovereign wealth funds have just begun to expand alternatives programs.

“While every institution is different, the trend is typically that sovereign wealth funds will tentatively explore alternatives and ramp up their allocations over a period of years,” Jones says.

“As a result, we’ve seen an overall trend of increasing numbers of sovereign wealth funds getting involved in private equity, real estate, infrastructure and hedge funds over the past years.”

Middle Eastern funds dominate the list of the sovereign wealth funds that are the biggest investors in property. According to Preqin, the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority invests more than $47 billion (see below).

 

Top five sovereign wealth funds by allocation to real estate

rank

sovereign wealth fund

country

allocation (millions)

1

Abu Dhabi Investment Authority

United Arab Emirates

$47,025

2

Qatar Investment Authority

Qatar

$25,651

3

Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC)

Singapore

$24,750

4

China Investment Corporation

China

$20,479

5

Kuwait Investment Authority

Kuwait

$9,768

*Source: Preqin

 

Direct or indirect?

Jones says that sovereign wealth funds are typically large, sophisticated and experienced investors in property and are, therefore, ideally suited to direct investment.

Some sovereign wealth funds, such as Qatar Investment Agency, even have their own subsidiaries set up purely to invest in real estate,” he says.

“The big draw of funds is the skill and talent of the fund managers. However, if you have the requisite in-house talent and resources, it makes sense for them to avoid the fees associated with fund structures and tap into the potential for higher returns by sourcing investments directly.”

When funds do choose property funds, 59 per cent invest in private funds while 35 per cent choose listed-property funds.

Preqin finds that US real estate is proving popular, with 79 per cent of sovereign wealth funds investing in US property market-focused funds.

This is followed by 57 per cent of sovereign wealth funds investing in Asia-focused funds, 54 per cent in Europe and 32 per cent in the Middle East and North Africa.

Sovereign wealth funds have also been prepared to invest in higher risk property strategies.

Opportunistic and value-added funds were the most popular strategies, favoured by 75 per cent and 65 per cent of sovereign wealth funds, respectively.

Funds have also looked to manage the overall risk of their portfolios in uncertain market conditions, with 55 per cent investing in less risky core-property funds.

Debt and distressed-real-estate funds have also proved popular with sovereign wealth funds in the current market conditions, attracting 55 per cent and 45 per cent of institutions.

The least popular strategies were fund of funds and secondaries funds.

 

Managing surplus risk enables pension plans and endowments to align their asset allocations with their future obligations.

Market Insight:Analyzing Hedges for Liability-Driven Investors seeks to better understand the drivers of surplus risk and to analyse the potentially subtle impact of specific hedges.

In Goldberg and Kim’s case study, a term-structure hedge using an interest-rate swap substantially lowers surplus risk as expected. However, a credit hedge using a default swap elevates surplus risk.

To read more click here