Generic strategies designed to harvest a certain factor premium regularly conflict with other factor premiums. We find that the premiums associated with these strategies tend to shrink, sometimes even to zero, in these periods of factor disagreement. Enhanced factor strategies, on the contrary, are explicitly designed to avoid stocks that are unattractive on other established factors. As a result, we find not only that their added value is higher on average, but also that they continue to deliver when generic factor strategies struggle. Read more about this white paper.
Sponsored Content
When factors disagree
Bart Van der Grient, David Blitz PhD, Pim van Vliet PhD, research, Robeco Asset Management
Sponsored Content
Private asset funds are no longer fit-for-purpose
The surging interest in generative AI has triggered a technological arms race, driving demand for data centres. Investors are looking to capitalise on what is often described as a generational opportunity, but as Blue Owl’s James Clarke cautions, there are several important factors to assess in partners for the long-term.
Sort content by
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.