Rethinking investment performance attribution

As asset owners move away from silo-based investment decision making, their performance attribution systems also need to evolve. The Alberta Investment Management Corporation AimCo, the C$70 billion arm’s length investment manager for public sector assets in Alberta, Canada, has implemented a new performance attribution system based on how managers actually make their investment decisions.

 

In an article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, authors Jagdeep Singh Baccher, Leo de Bever, Roman Chuyan and Ashby Monk, outline the history of the organisation’s investment performance attribution system, which was essentially a decomposition of the total value added in the prescribed “allocation” and “selection” buckets.

The new decision-based attribution system was designed to mirror the way AimCo actually makes investment decisions.

This includes which agents in the ecosystem are adding value – from the chief investment officer in asset allocation decision making, to the heads of assets classes making decisions about various markets within asset classes, and portfolio managers and analysts making decisions about specific stocks and bonds.

In addition to tactical asset allocation decisions, the new system also considers opportunistic decisions that don’t fit within an asset class.

Sponsored Content

As outlined in the article, the authors say the new decision-based attribution system has materially improved AimCo’s ability to understand the relationship between investment decisions and investment results.

This is particularly important given that performance attribution should not just explain the past, but be a tool to make better future investment decisions.

 

The full article can be accessed below

Rethinking Investment Performance Attribution

 

Jagdeep Singh Bachher was executive vice-president at AimCo when the article was written, he is now the chief investment officer of the University of California

Leo de Bever is chief executive of AimCo

Roman Chuyan is president and chief investment officer at Model Capital Management

Ashby Monk is executive director of Stanford University’s Global Projects Center

Asset Owner:AIMCo

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Misaligned incentives, bank mismanagement and troubling policy implications

This paper by New York University’s Jonas Prager outlines the major changes in the financial structure as well as the focal events that characterised the 2007-2008 global financial crisis and considers the evidence for the crucial role played by misaligned incentives. Misaligned incentives, bank mismanagement, and troubling policy implications mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous