Ohio uncertain on alternatives consultant

The $72 billion Ohio Public Employees Retirement System is looking for an investment consultant to advise on its $10 billion alternatives program, and is considering whether to hire separate consultants for each asset class or one consultant to advise on the entire program.

The fund, which has $60 billion in the defined benefit fund and the remainder in health care, has about $3 billion in private equity, $5 billion in real estate, $665 million in hedge funds, $800 million in REITs, and $98 million in commodities.

The RFP document outlines that the OPERS board wants to consider whether to consolidate all strategic alternatives investment consultant relations with one firm or to retain its existing arrangement of separate mandates – for private equity, real estate, and for the first time, hedge funds.

“OPERS understands that consolidating services with fewer providers usually provides cost savings. Nonetheless, OPERS also understands that many plans retain specialist expertise through separate consultant mandates, as OPERS is currently structured. Consulting firms have developed different business models. In some cases, those models are in transition,” the document says.

With this in mind, and in particular the consideration of the value proposition of using separate services for alternatives asset classes, the fund is asking for proposal on two distinct levels: either for individual asset classes; or as strategic alternatives consultant, combining all three.

Services for alternatives would include market overview and strategy for each asset type as well as policy advice, program guidelines, sector allocations, and investment pacing models but would not include manager-level selection or advice.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous