CalPERS to move $1bn fixed income in-house

CalPERS plans to move $1 billion of its externally-managed international fixed income portfolio in-house in the next 12 months, but it will require board approval to do so.

Meanwhile the external international fixed income managers – PIMCO, Baring Asset Management, Rogge Global Partners and Alliance Bernstein – have had their contracts extended for another year.

About 89 per cent of the $42 billion invested in fixed income assets is managed internally, and the team has a vision which includes insourcing where it “makes sense”. At the moment all of the international fixed income portfolio is externally managed.

CalPERS estimates the cost of internal management is only one to three basis points, as opposed to the cost of external management, which is 20 to 30 basis points.

The fixed income assets account for 19 per cent of the overall portfolio, and the majority of that, 17 per cent of the overall portfolio, is in domestic fixed income, with only 2 per cent in international.

The 38-member fixed income team led by senior investment officer, Curtis Ishii (pictured) also manages other programs representing $44.4 billion in assets, including inflation, affiliate funds (such as TIPS), liquidity, securities lending and currency overlay.

Sponsored Content

A key assumption of internal management is the ability to attract and retain investment professionals, and it is also a key initiative for the fund to set aside time and money to invest in staff development, as well as hire more internal staff.

In addition to internally managing $1 billion of international fixed income, the fixed income team has also prioritised in-sourcing short-term funds, primarily in the global equities and securities lending programs; and continuing to explore portable alpha opportunities.
It also plans to work with the corporate governance teams on a number of initiatives including working with the SEC to make changes to bond holders’ rights; and with government institutions on rating agency reform.

In a board presentation this week it was also outlined that the experience of the fixed income group will be drawn on for total fund initiatives including the construction of a total fund attribution system to supplement the one developed for global fixed income.

It will also work with asset allocation/risk management and investment servicing units to enhance investment operational infrastructure.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous